Disappointing

Discussion on Stirling or "hot air" engines (all types)
cbstirling2
Posts: 156
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2016 9:35 pm

Re: Disappointing

Post by cbstirling2 »

CBStirling2
Aviator168
Posts: 308
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:29 pm
Location: Brokeville, NY. USA

Re: Disappointing

Post by Aviator168 »

A professor has that solved and he demonstrated it. Just needs development money to mass produce. It also produces more power as it can be a lithium metal battery rather than lithium ion.
Saw that program. One very important thing they have not address is the charging time. As a matter of fact, they never mentioned it, which I think is the biggest issue facing electric cars. The range issue can be solved by building more charging stations IF charging time can be reduced to a few minutes like fueling up the tank with gasoline.
Trevor
Posts: 228
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2016 4:07 am

Re: Disappointing

Post by Trevor »

High CB, that was a very impressive video. Solves the problem of exploding batteries. Being made of plastics, I think that the charging time would be slow.
Trev
Bumpkin
Posts: 282
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:42 pm

Re: Disappointing

Post by Bumpkin »

Back to the thread premise; I pretty much agree with this paper:
http://file.scirp.org/pdf/ENG_2015121717392471.pdf
Bumpkin
Aviator168
Posts: 308
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:29 pm
Location: Brokeville, NY. USA

Re: Disappointing

Post by Aviator168 »

That's the paper I sighted. For all intend and purposes, the authors did not use a efficient burner for the study. The nasal report indicated the mod ii had an over all efficiency of more than 36% which I think is pretty good.
Post Reply