Page 3 of 3

Re: Disappointing

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 7:05 am
by cbstirling2

Re: Disappointing

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 7:12 am
by Aviator168
A professor has that solved and he demonstrated it. Just needs development money to mass produce. It also produces more power as it can be a lithium metal battery rather than lithium ion.

Saw that program. One very important thing they have not address is the charging time. As a matter of fact, they never mentioned it, which I think is the biggest issue facing electric cars. The range issue can be solved by building more charging stations IF charging time can be reduced to a few minutes like fueling up the tank with gasoline.

Re: Disappointing

Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2017 2:06 pm
by Trevor
High CB, that was a very impressive video. Solves the problem of exploding batteries. Being made of plastics, I think that the charging time would be slow.
Trev

Re: Disappointing

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 11:51 am
by Bumpkin
Back to the thread premise; I pretty much agree with this paper:
http://file.scirp.org/pdf/ENG_2015121717392471.pdf
Bumpkin

Re: Disappointing

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 2:50 pm
by Aviator168
That's the paper I sighted. For all intend and purposes, the authors did not use a efficient burner for the study. The nasal report indicated the mod ii had an over all efficiency of more than 36% which I think is pretty good.

Re: Disappointing

Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 6:58 pm
by SokSareth
Sua página foi absolutamente fantástica! Grande informação excelente
E isso pode ser útil algum ou talvez o contrário.
Mantenha atualizado seus tópicos, antecipando para obter conteúdos mais detalhados.

goldenslot
gclub casino